LG L1952T vs Samsung SyncMaster 940BW lcd monitor shopping review

The same 19" screen size is on both LG L1952T and Samsung SyncMaster 940BW. Maximum declared screen resolution on SyncMaster 940BW (1440x900) beats L1952T (1280x1024).

Both monitors have good response times of their pixels (Samsung SyncMaster 940BW has 4ms and LG L1952T has 8ms pixel response time).

Picture on both monitors could be very bright (300 cd/m2). Contrast ratio is very good only on LG L1952T (1400:1), the another monitor has poor contrast (500:1). Horizontal viewing angle is poor on monitors (160º). These TFT monitors are poor for watching tv programs or movies on them since they have vertical viewing angle of 160º.

Both of these monitors have DVI to connect them to newer video cards.

More Information

 

 

 

 

More LCD Monitor Comparisons:
LG L194WT vs ViewSonic VA1912wb.
LG L194WT vs NEC 70GX2.
Samsung SyncMaster 204B vs Westinghouse LCM-17V8.
ViewSonic VX924 vs HP vs17e.
ViewSonic VP2330wb vs Mag LT917S.
ViewSonic VP2330wb vs LG L1932TQ.
LG L1732TQ vs LG L1952T.
Mag LT926WB vs Samsung SyncMaster 931B.
LG L1732TQ vs Westinghouse LCM-17v2.
Samsung SyncMaster 940MW vs ViewSonic VG2021M.
ViewSonic VX2235wm vs Acer AL1706AB.
Apple LCM-22W2 vs Samsung SyncMaster 940BW.
Apple LCM-22W2 vs Samsung SyncMaster 225BW.
Acer AL1706AB vs Gateway FDP1760.
eMachines E17T4 vs ViewSonic VP2330wb.
Acer AL2017bmd vs NEC 90GX2-BK.
Acer AL2216Wbd vs ViewSonic VX924.
ViewSonic ThinEdge VP930B vs Westinghouse LCM-19v5.
Samsung SyncMaster 740N vs Acer AL1916W.
HP L1706 vs Samsung 920N.
ViewSonic VP2330wb vs HP f2105.