LG L1952T vs Acer AL2216W lcd monitor comparison

We liked 22" monitor size on Acer AL2216W quite better than 19" monitor size at LG L1952T. With its declared 1680x1050 maximum screen resolution Acer AL2216W monitor beats LG L1952T with its 1280x1024.

Pixel response time on these monitors is 5ms for AL2216W and 8ms for L1952T and that means they have good pixel response times.

These monitors have brightness 300cd/m2 and that means they can have very bright picture. Both monitors have very good contrast ratio (L1952T has 1400:1 and AL2216W has 700:1). Horizontal viewing angle is bad on both monitors (170º at Acer AL2216W and 160º at LG L1952T) for watching movies. Vertical angle is 160º on both and therefore you might feel unconfortable watching movies on them.

Both of these monitors have VGA input jack for connection to older graphic cards. DVI input which these monitors have allows you to use with modern video cards.

More Information

 

 

 

 

More LCD Monitor Comparisons:
HP L1706 vs Samsung SyncMaster 203B.
Gateway FDP1975W vs Samsung 920N.
ViewSonic Optiquest Q9b-2 vs Westinghouse LCM-19W4.
Samsung SyncMaster 971P vs Acer AL1916Ab.
Gateway FDP1760 vs Samsung SyncMaster 204BW.
Samsung SyncMaster 931BF vs Westinghouse LCM-19W4.
HP f2105 vs Sony PremierPro SDM-P234.
HP L1706 vs LG L1732TQ.
Samsung SyncMaster 731BF vs Samsung SyncMaster 931B.
ViewSonic VA912b vs Samsung SyncMaster 940BW.
Dell E176FP vs NEC 70GX2.
Samsung SyncMaster 970P vs eMachines E17T4.
Samsung SyncMaster 971P vs Apple M9177LL.
Samsung SyncMaster 204BW vs ViewSonic VX924.
Apple LCM-22W2 vs Dell UltraSharp 1907FP.
Acer AL1916W vs ViewSonic ThinEdge VP930B.
Samsung SyncMaster 740N vs Mag LT917GB.