LG L1952T vs Acer AL2016W lcd monitor comparison

We think 20.1 inch screen at Acer AL2016W is better than 19 inches screen size at L1952T. If you like higher screen resolutions than you might decide that Acer AL2016W is better with its 1680x1050 than LG L1952T with 1280x1024.

Pixel response time on these monitors is 8ms and that means you should not expirience so called "ghosts" on them.

These monitors have brightness 300cd/m2 and that means they can have very bright picture. Contrast ratio is very good on these tft monitors (L1952T has 1400:1 and AL2016W has 600:1). Horizontal angle is 160º on L1952T and 140 ºon AL2016W and those values makes them unsuitable for watching movies. These tft monitors are poor choice for watching tv programs or movies since they haven't decent vertical viewing angles (L1952T has 160º and AL2016W has 130º).

DVI input which LG L1952T monitor has allows you to use it on modern graphic cards.

More Information

 

 

 

 

More LCD Monitor Comparisons:
Acer AL1706AB vs Samsung SyncMaster 940MW.
Samsung SyncMaster 970P vs ViewSonic VP2030b.
ViewSonic VA912b vs Mag LT717S.
Samsung SyncMaster 204B vs Samsung SyncMaster 930B.
ViewSonic VP2330wb vs Apple LCM-22W2.
HP L1706 vs LG L1932TQ.
Acer Ferrari F-20 vs Samsung SyncMaster 940BW.
Westinghouse LCM-17v2 vs Westinghouse LCM-19v5.
Acer Ferrari F-20 vs NEC 90GX2-BK.
LG L194WT vs LG L1952T.
Samsung SyncMaster 940MW vs ViewSonic VA903b.
Dell UltraSharp 3007WFP vs ViewSonic VX922.
Samsung SyncMaster 203B vs Samsung SyncMaster 970P.
ViewSonic VX2235wm vs Apple M9177LL.
Acer AL1916W vs ViewSonic VA912b.
Samsung SyncMaster 731BF vs Westinghouse LCM-17V8.
ViewSonic Optiquest Q9b-2 vs Acer AL2216W.