Dell E176FP vs Samsung SyncMaster 940BW tft monitor reviews

We prefere 19 inch wide screen size at model SyncMaster 940BW than 17 built at model E176FP. Graphic professionals might find Samsung SyncMaster 940BW model with its 1440x900 maximum screen resulution more preferable.

Decent response time has only Samsung SyncMaster 940BW with 4ms. Dell E176FP haven't good pixel response time with 12ms.

Picture on both monitors could be very bright (300 cd/m2). Both TFT monitors have poor contrast ratio (SyncMaster 940BW has 500:1 and E176FP has 450:1). Horizontal angle is 160º on SyncMaster 940BW and 120 ºon E176FP and those values makes them unsuitable for watching movies. These LCD monitors are poor choice for watching tv programs or movies since they haven't decent vertical viewing angles (SyncMaster 940BW has 160º and E176FP has 140º).

Only Samsung SyncMaster 940BW has DVI input which allows you to connect it to newer video cards.

More Information

 

 

 

 

More LCD Monitor Comparisons:
eMachines E17T4 vs Sony PremierPro SDM-P234.
Acer AL1916W vs ViewSonic VA1912wb.
LG L194WT vs Samsung SyncMaster 931BF.
Acer Ferrari F-20 vs Acer AL2016W.
Acer AL2216W vs Westinghouse LCM-19W4.
Samsung SyncMaster 740N vs Dell UltraSharp 2007WFP.
Gateway FDP1975W vs LG L1932TQ.
Mag LT917S vs ViewSonic VP2330wb.
Acer AL2216W vs ViewSonic VP2330wb.
Samsung SyncMaster 940MW vs Westinghouse LCM-17W7.
eMachines E19T5W vs Samsung SyncMaster 225BW.
Samsung SyncMaster 940BW vs ViewSonic Optiquest Q9b-2.
Acer Ferrari F-20 vs LG L1970HR.
Samsung SyncMaster 225BW vs ViewSonic Optiquest Q9b-2.
HP f1905e vs Samsung SyncMaster 205BW.
ViewSonic VA1912wb vs ViewSonic VX2025WM.