Acer AL2016W vs Samsung SyncMaster 204B lcd monitor review

Both models have the same 20.1" screen size. Maximum declared screen resolution on AL2016W (1680x1050) beats SyncMaster 204B (1600x1200).

Both of compared TFT monitors have decent pixel response times.

Both monitors are able to privide very bright picture (300 cd/m2). Contrast is quite good on these tft monitors (SyncMaster 204B has 800:1 and AL2016W has 600:1). Horizontal angle is 160º on SyncMaster 204B and 140 ºon AL2016W and those values makes them unsuitable for watching . Vertical viewing angle is bad on both monitors (160º at Samsung SyncMaster 204B and 130º at Acer AL2016W) for watching movies.

These TFT monitors have VGA input for connection to older video cards. DVI input which Samsung SyncMaster 204B monitor has allows you to use it on new video cards.

More Information

 

 

 

 

More LCD Monitor Comparisons:
ViewSonic VA912b vs Westinghouse LCM-19v5.
Acer AL2216W vs ViewSonic VG2021M.
Samsung SyncMaster 205BW vs Samsung SyncMaster 940MW.
NEC 70GX2 vs Samsung SyncMaster 940BW.
Acer AL1706AB vs HP f1905e.
ViewSonic VA912b vs Sony PremierPro SDM-P234.
ViewSonic VG2021M vs ViewSonic VP2330wb.
Gateway FDP1760 vs Samsung SyncMaster 203B.
Mag LT917S vs Samsung SyncMaster 970P.
ViewSonic VA1912wb vs eMachines E17T4.
Mag LT926WB vs Samsung SyncMaster 244T.
Samsung SyncMaster 203B vs ViewSonic ThinEdge VP930B.
ViewSonic VA903b vs Dell UltraSharp 3007WFP.
Mag LT917S vs Samsung 920N.
Acer AL2216W vs Westinghouse LCM-19W4.
Samsung SyncMaster 970P vs Acer AL1916W.
ViewSonic VA1912wb vs ViewSonic VA903b.
Dell E176FP vs Gateway FDP1760.